Do you think theyd be at risk for future violence and is there potential for them to be rehabilitated.MUST USE: Huss, Matthew T.Forensic Psychology: Research, Clinical Practice and Applications 2nd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell.
MUST ALSO ONLY USE. MATERIAL GIVEN WATCH: WATCH: WATCH: DB2: Review the case of Roper v Simmons on page 8 in our textbook and discuss your thoughts about the ultimate outcome. Why was the amicus curiae filed and how is this case an example of case law vs. DB3: After reviewing the Anna Nicole Smith Case, answer the following: What court was Anna Nicole Smiths case initiated in and why What State Courts were involved and why did the Federal Court get involved What did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rule However, which court is the highest court and has the final word What did the United States Supreme Court decide in 2006 E. Why did the court battle continue since both parties were deceased and what did the U. ![]() Supreme courts decision and why DB4: Discuss the case of Andrea Yates. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised Creator Trial And NotWhy was she given two trials Why was she found guilty in her first trial and not guilty by reason of insanity in her second trial. Do you think Andrea Yates had mens rea (knew what she was doing at the time of the crime) or do you think she was insane (at the time she was committing these crimes) We will learn more about this in the chapter on Insanity, however, this is an interesting case as there were two trials with very different verdicts. DB5: In Chapter 2 they discuss the difference between the therapeutic assessment and the forensic assessment. If you were the Forensic Psychologist hired by the court to assess Andrea Yates, which one would you implement and why Which assessment would you utilize if you were hired to treat Andrea Yates mental illness In addition would you utilize an unstructured, semi-structured or structured interview and what are the pros and cons of each What archival information was available relevant to the Andrea Yates case From a Forensic Psychology perspective who are we treating and is it successful What are the concerns with Forensic Consultation DB6: What does it mean when the courts balance the probative value against the prejudicial value when admitting evidence Discuss the history of the admissibility of evidence making reference to Frye v. United States (1923), Dauber V Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc (1997), General Electric Co v Joiner (1997), Kumho Tire Co, Ltd v Carmichael (1999). Why was Jenkins v U.S. Forensic Psychologists When thinking of expert testimony, if a witness provides information that is objected to and the judge agrees, he will advise the jury to strike it from the record What does that mean and do you think the testimony given will still influence the juries decision making process Why is the courtroom perceived to be an adversarial process and who does it benefit DB7: Based on the video of the clinical psychologists testimony, do you think she was a credible witness. Did you find her to be knowledgeable and confident when giving her testimony and did you believe what she was saying Why or why not What did she do, say or not say that supports your reasoning. D900 code reader software updateWhat did she diagnose Jeffrey Dahmer with If you were a juror on the Jeffrey Dahmer trial would you find him not guilty by reason of insanity based solely on her testimony Why or why not If you were a juror on any trial, what would be of most significance to you when determining if someone was credible or not credible when giving testimony. This response is subjective as we all have different perceptions and personalities. Do any of you have any personal experience serving jury duty DB8: What is the difference between a primary and secondary psychopath How do they process information cognitively, emotionally and biologically Is therapy successful in treating psychopaths Why or why not Give an example of a psychopath that you are familiar with either from what youve learned or the newtelevision. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised Creator Serial Killers AreIn Chapter 4 they also talk about successful psychopaths which is an interesting concept since serial killers are typically thought of when hearing this term. Give an example of a successful psychopath and relate this person to specific characteristics from Robert Hares Psychopathy Checklist Revised. DB9: Jeffrey Dahmer was a notorious serial killer who murdred 17 young men, engaged in necrophilia and ingested their body parts as well. After watching the interview, do you think Jeffrey Dahmer is a primary or secondary psychopath and what characteristics does he display from Robert Hares Psychopathy Checklist Revised (support this with what you observed during the interview) Do you think Jeffrey Dahmer was sincere and expressed true emotion during the interview Do you think Jeffrey Dahmer could have been treated successfully. Why or why not Why did Jeffrey Dahmer engage in cannibalism and eat his victims What psychologically would account for this behavior How many of you were familiar with this case and how do you feel about it after watching the interview DB10: What is meant by violence risk assessment and how is violence defined What happened in Barefoot v. Estelle and what precedent did it set Do you agree or disagree with the decision Discuss the pros and cons of the different types of risk assessments: clinical, actuarial and structured. What type of assessment was used in the risk assessment of Paul Bernardo and what potential problems did this cause DB11: What is a sexual offender and how would a Forensic Psychologist conduct an assessment of a sexual offender According to the DSM-V what is the difference between being diagnosed with a paraphilia vs. Can sexual offenders be successfully treated What are your feelings about the Jerry Sandusky case that is mentioned in our textbookwhat do you think could have caused him to become a sex offende, what was his sexual preference and how did he choose his victims Why was he able to perpetrate victims for so many years and do you think he could be successfully treated DB12: What was your reaction to this case Would Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka be considered psychopaths and support why or why not What type of risk assessment would you conduct and why What type of sex offenders would they be (support this with our chapter on Sex Offenders which is your next DB post). How is criminal profiling used in this case and was it helpful What were some of the problemsconcerns in this investigation that delayed investigators in catching Paul Bernardo How was Bernardo ultimately caught and why was Karla Homolka seen as the primary aggressor in the murders of Tammy Homolka, Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorAndrew ArchivesCategories |